The INTJ-INTP Type Clarifier
As discussed in our book, My True Type, there are myriad reasons why identifying your true personality type is not as easy as one might suspect. This is especially true for introverts, since the J-P nature of their dominant function is actually the inverse of their J-P preference. This, in conjunction with other variables, has generated ample type confusion, with countless INTJs mistyping as INTPs, and vice-versa. Such confusion has been furthered and perpetuated by popular personality tests that rely exclusively on generic J-P questions to distinguish between these closely related types.
To combat this type confusion, we developed the INTJ-INTP Type Clarifier. Unlike other personality tests, this unique assessment is based on extensive research and observations of specific INTJ and INTP characteristics.
If you are struggling to discern whether you are an INTJ or INTP, or simply want expert confirmation of your type, this assessment is essential. As an added bonus, you’ll receive a PDF document containing detailed rationales for all the test items, which many Personality Junkie readers have found helpful. Finally, if you don’t find this assessment beneficial, we’ll give you a full refund, no questions asked.
Features:
- Instant online access to the INTJ-INTP Type Clarifier test.
- 50 carefully researched questions, designed to identify key INTJ-INTP type differences in social behavior and demeanor, modes of cognition, attitudes toward science, religion, morality, etc.
- Results delivered in a percentage format, allowing you to gauge the strength of your type preference.
- A 20+ page packet containing all the test questions and their associated rationales (a great learning opportunity!).
- Fully refundable if you aren’t completely satisfied.
Bundle #1
INTJ-INTP Clarifier + My True Type
$15
*eBook is compatible with all devices, including Kindle & iOS
Bundle #2
INTJ-INTP Clarifier + Both eBooks
$20
*eBooks compatible with all devices, including Kindle & iOS
“ Testimonials ”
“Enlightening”
-Ben Thomas, Research Assistant
“When I dove into MBTI typology two years ago, I was immediately certain of my I and N preference. But no matter how much I read, I couldn’t decide my J-P preference. So I purchased this test yesterday and found the explanatory PDF particularly helpful for seeing my INTP tendencies. I also purchased your INTP books and what eye-openers! Your work is by far the most enlightening I have seen thus far.”
“Great Personality Tool”
-Jules Henderson, Marketing
“I’ve struggled to know whether I’m an INTP or INTJ for a long time now. It can be really hard to sort out the actual differences between these two types. Fortunately this test and the rationales helped clear up a lot of my questions and gave me more confidence in my type going forward. Thanks so much for developing this great personality tool.”
“More Confident about My Type”
-Angela Cornish, Software Developer
“Clearly, a great deal of thought was put into this assessment. More than anything, I appreciated the rationales for the test items, which revealed the evidence and reasoning behind them. I now feel more confident and informed about my type.”
“Confirmed My Type”
-Chris Sheldrake, Graduate Student
“I’ve always been rather skeptical of personality tests, but I must admit I was impressed with this one. Together with the rationales, this test confirmed my type as an INTP and helped me better understand the key differences between these two types.”
“Highly Recommend to INTJs or INTPs”
-Jeffrey Braskey, Engineer
“No personality test is perfect. Human beings are just too damn complex. But like Dr. Drenth’s books, this test was very beneficial for helping me better understand my type. I highly recommend it to other INTJs or INTPs.”
“Unlike Any Other Test”
-Kathryn Hendrix, Graphic Designer
“This was unlike any other personality test I’ve taken (in a good way). Many of the questions were longer or more specific than other questionnaires. This made it harder to immediately know which response corresponded to each type. I also liked the rationales which bettered my understanding of these two types. Great work!”